Northern Sky Research

LEO HTS Constellations: “What Happens If…”

Mar 23rd, 2015 by Jose Del Rosario   More from this Analyst | Profile

Redirected to subject matter Research Director - original author no longer with NSR

The LEO Constellation Ecosystem

OneWeb, SpaceX and LeoSat seem to be taking on, or at least complementing, Cellular & Fiber in terms of trying to marry the reach of LEO satellites with the price per bit approaching terrestrial offerings. Announcements over the past few weeks peg total system capacities between 0.5 and 10+ Terabits for investments ranging from $2 Billion to $10 Billion. A long standing question about CPE prices seems to be generating answers within the $100 to $300 range for a Metamaterials antenna that is still some time away from availability. Nonetheless, with speeds of anywhere from 50 Mbps to 1.2 Gbps being offered to the end user, it seems that entrepreneurs, and investors, have woken up to the idea that LEO satellites are the answer to deliver a global service with terabits of capacity.

…And Terabits It Is!

The table above clearly shows that anywhere from 20-30 MEO satellites and 30 to ~5,000 LEO satellites can possibly launch into these two, relatively untapped, orbits in the next decade. As an analyst and strategic advisory firm trying to pin down the satellite market, NSR observes a change in satellite capacity supply of an order of magnitude never seen before. NSR’s VSAT and Broadband Satellite Markets, 13th Edition and Global Satellite Capacity Supply & Demand, 11th Edition reported that a total of 2.5 Terabits of High Throughput capacity would become available by 2023; this figure only included GEO and MEO HTS. This figure also does not include the hundreds of transponders worth of traditional FSS capacity. Nonetheless, the quantum leap that was taken over the last 5 years from a few Gigabits (widebeam FSS) to hundreds of Gigabits (GEO HTS) may very well be repeated when LEO HTS satellites change the goal posts from hundreds of Gigabits to tens of Terabits of capacity. NSR’s VSAT & Broadband study estimated nearly 1 Gbps of demand for broadband services, but if price per bit comes down significantly, that demand curve for Enterprise VSAT and Consumer Broadband will get more exponential very quickly.

But What Happens If…

Scenario 1: Only One Constellation Launches

With satellites ranging from a minimum of 80 (LeoSat) to a maximum of 4,000 (SpaceX) it would be safe to say that even if one constellation launches, it could mean a pretty sizeable order to a “prime" satellite manufacturer (SpaceX intends to manufacture in-house). With a maximum of 17-20 launchers in service, averaging 75-80 launches per year to GEO and LEO combined, launching even one constellation will put severe pressure on the rocket supply chain. The total cost of any one system is easily in the Billions of dollars, and the last time such a significant investment was made on one constellation (Iridium) it ended up being sold post financial woes for a fraction of the original investment cost.

Bottom line is that even one constellation presents challenges and the TCO of the system is high, which could prevent bandwidth costs from coming down to a few dollars per megabit range. What this does to Enterprise data applications on FSS satellites is offer them an alternative to GEO HTS that they can either grow incrementally towards (i.e. from GEO HTS to LEO HTS) or simply leapfrog by going from widebeam FSS directly to LEO HTS.

Scenario 2: All Constellations Launch

Now if one looks at the absolute maximum, some very serious questions start to emerge. How does an industry build and launch ~5,000 satellites even if they are much smaller than the traditional GEO COMSATS? With the same 17-20 active launchers, averaging the same 75-80 launches per year to GEO and LEO combined, launching all constellations in a 2 to 5-year window seems near impossible. NSR estimates that if all constellations do go ahead as planned, we are looking at capacity of the order of 20-30 Terabits coming online in the next decade, which is orders of magnitude higher than the 2.5 Terabits of GEO/MEO HTS capacity that NSR expected by 2023. The biggest questions on everyone’s mind when looking at those figures are two-fold:

  1. Where is the demand to fill up 20-30 Terabits of supply and generate positive returns?
  2. Where will the falling price points finally settle from the hundreds of dollars per megabit today, and will there be a “race to the bottom”?

Bottom Line

To the average enterprise, the advent of HTS meant they now had access to a much cheaper cost per bit for their VSAT networks. Some switched quickly (Retail, Banking etc.), while some took their own time (Oil & Gas, Mil/Gov etc.), but GEO HTS is clearly here to stay. The next big quantum leap is LEO HTS and to the enterprise this means putting plans of changing HTS platforms on hold for a bit and “wait and watch” what the big guys bring to the table before either leap frogging to LEO HTS with say OneWeb or LeoSat or growing incrementally with GEO HTS on EpicNG, NBN and others.

Even if the industry remains divided on whether all this capacity constitutes a “bubble”, it remains feasible that 20-30 Terabits of capacity could be launched by 2020. Hypothetically, if all this capacity were available today and sold at rates of $500/Mbps (equivalent of $1,500-$2,000 per MHz in Ku-band at 1:3 or 1:4 Bits per Hz modulation & coding) it would mean revenues of the order of $15-$20 Billion, which is 10% of the entire satellite industry’s revenues as per the 2014 SIA report. Now one must factor in that only a portion of this capacity can be truly “commercialized” and only 30-40% of it is over land mass, not to mention unique landing rights in each country that make selling this capacity a rather tough problem to solve.  And cost effective antenna technology required on the ground is far from reality anytime soon, which may be a larger problem that launching massive volumes of capacity into orbit.

The common belief in the satellite industry that “users need more, cost effective capacity” is certainly without question; high cost and scarce satellite capacity have limited growth potential for years.  “Offer users more bandwidth and they will use it”; this trend is prevalent in every segment of the telecom industry.  However, the true metric for success is return on investment, and given the high cost of proposed LEO systems, turning a profit in short(er) order is vital.  And, if all of this LEO capacity hits the market at once, questions remain of how big the addressable market really is and if revenue generation will be compromised if there is indeed a “race to the bottom” on prices.

Which of the scenarios mentioned above actually sees the light of day? The answer, as always, lies somewhere in the middle where out of the multiple announced LEO constellations, NSR would wager about 2 or 3 actually launch. Even if only one constellation launches, the leap in capacity and drop in price will most certainly mean that Enterprise Data and even Consumer Broadband applications on widebeam FSS satellites will almost entirely migrate to GEO or LEO HTS thereby leaving traditional GEO COMSATs to become video-only in the long run. And then, there is always OTT…